Unofficial World of Warcraft Forums  
Please respect other members. Please do not post links or information about hacking/warez/cheats.
Read the rules of these forums as we rarely warn before banning. Lost or need RSS check the forum map.

Quick Site Nav
Navigation
WoW: IncGamers
WoW Forums
Community Blogs
WoW Info
Wrath of the Lich King Info
Primary Professions
Secondary Professions
Maps
Classes
PvP
A-Z Index
Guides
Submit Guides
List Guides
UI/Mods
Latest Mods
Submit Mod
List Macros
Submit Macro
Media Gallery
Gallery Home
Upload Pics
Community WoW Shots
Community BC Shots
Player Pics
Official WoW Shots
Official BC Shots


Donate and get extra forum perks
Support WoW:IncGamers

Go Back   Unofficial World of Warcraft Forums > WoW Community Forums > Community Discussion
Connect with Facebook

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22-10-2005, 06:32 AM   #61
Four Fathers
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Four Fathers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 61
It would be more advisable to introduce new classes. Do the math and you will agree that through introduction of new classes the number of playable options would be much higher.

This new profession related blabbering is just pathetic. Looks like a patch work, and a cheap one.

Flying mounts - :happy34:

And all will be revealed within a week....
Four Fathers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2005, 07:03 AM   #62
KmoTehGod
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 25
God this is like waiting for WoW all over again, I WANT IT NOW!!!!
KmoTehGod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2005, 07:16 AM   #63
Four Fathers
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Four Fathers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by KmoTehGod
God this is like waiting for WoW all over again, I WANT IT NOW!!!!
Are you 12? What does it change if you knew?
Four Fathers is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 22-10-2005, 09:10 AM   #64
OverKill
WoW: IncGamers Member
 
OverKill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 410
Sooner is better. Doesn't matter what age you are.
OverKill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2005, 09:57 AM   #65
Four Fathers
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Four Fathers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by OverKill
Sooner is better. Doesn't matter what age you are.
Memento mori.
Four Fathers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2005, 11:17 AM   #66
DoomDrake
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
DoomDrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Four Fathers
Memento mori.
Don't tell me that you're NOT waiting for Blizzcon to be over so that we know some more about the expansion?!

Homo Sum, Nihil Humani A Me Alineum Puto.

Yeah, man! :happy14:
DoomDrake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2005, 12:09 PM   #67
OverKill
WoW: IncGamers Member
 
OverKill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 410
Si uno zapatos rojo loco.
OverKill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2005, 03:08 PM   #68
The Romulans
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loriin
what's mentioned for the expansion is pretty much standard fair. In fact, a lot of first expansions dont even get a new race.

Im sure in future expansions (And I bet there will be many..EQ is on ..9 now I think, and that never had the amount of people WoW has) there'll be new classes.
Talk like this really "grinds my gears". EverQuest was a superbly ridiculous cash cow of a "game" - the more people compare the two games... its as if you are saying what EQ did was acceptable. The more people talk like this, the more WoW folks will obviously take note that this is what the community is expecting anyway... so why not crank out some useless cash cow expansion sets which SHOULD have been content patches included in the monthly fee.

And no I'm not saying thats what this expansion is or anything like that (although I am pretty annoyed of the progress of WoW)... I certainly hope not, although I suspect it will be.

So much for Outland "being in the game" already. The amount of things I feel mislead about by pre-release WoW hype / previews / whatever is astouding.
The Romulans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2005, 03:38 PM   #69
AngryMob
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
AngryMob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Estonia
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Romulans
So much for Outland "being in the game" already. The amount of things I feel mislead about by pre-release WoW hype / previews / whatever is astouding.
????? outland is in the game already, if blizzard is going to open it in expansion just shows how cheap they are, trying to make more money from the content that was supposed to be patch content:s
AngryMob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2005, 06:21 PM   #70
Loriin
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Romulans
Talk like this really "grinds my gears". EverQuest was a superbly ridiculous cash cow of a "game" - the more people compare the two games... its as if you are saying what EQ did was acceptable. The more people talk like this, the more WoW folks will obviously take note that this is what the community is expecting anyway... so why not crank out some useless cash cow expansion sets which SHOULD have been content patches included in the monthly fee.

And no I'm not saying thats what this expansion is or anything like that (although I am pretty annoyed of the progress of WoW)... I certainly hope not, although I suspect it will be.

So much for Outland "being in the game" already. The amount of things I feel mislead about by pre-release WoW hype / previews / whatever is astouding.
Sorry if it came out like that mate, I didnt mean it to. My point was that a lot of WoWers come from D2 and WC3, and expansions for games like that happen a little differently than MMORPG expansions. (Classic example, a person without Frozen Throne cant play with a person with it...in a MMORPG, people just cant access expansion content). Just dont want people to have undue expectations.

For the record, I only played EQ for like 6 months..I was just making an example.
Loriin is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 22-10-2005, 09:21 PM   #71
Falkman
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Falkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryMob
????? outland is in the game already, if blizzard is going to open it in expansion just shows how cheap they are, trying to make more money from the content that was supposed to be patch content:s
The rumours says that the Outland in the expansion will be vastly bigger than the Outland model already in the game, so Blizzard is redoing it completely.
Falkman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2005, 01:38 AM   #72
OverKill
WoW: IncGamers Member
 
OverKill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 410
Using a 3rd party model viewer to try to know what to expect for future non-expansion patches is... kinda stupid.
OverKill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2005, 06:05 AM   #73
KmoTehGod
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Four Fathers
Are you 12? What does it change if you knew?
it changes the fact that i dont know.
KmoTehGod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2005, 07:54 PM   #74
Kworby
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 3
Spellbreaker is the dumbest class idea ever. Not only does it have a stupid name, but to make a class that is obviously much stronger than casters and much weaker than melee is plain retarded.

The original Italian article doesn't sound too far-fetched, though I don't know if I like the whole Blood Elf thing.
Kworby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2005, 09:55 AM   #75
ByAccident
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ablamar
Okay so far I would not buy the expansion if Blizzard wouldn't add anything more than that. I have never seen such a weak expansion. But things might still change.

There is one thing I want to mention or question. Why would the cross realm BGs be a part of the expansion? It is a technical thing that Blizzard has to solve with their servers architecture. If the cross faction BGs would be an expansion only thing, then people who don't buy the expansion can no longer PvP inside the BGs. So I truly hope that information had absolutely nothing to do with the expansion. You can't force people to buy an expansion for a feature they can use now but can't any longer when the expansion comes out. And they can't just make cross faction BGs and keep the old ones. Most people buy the expansion, so that would still screw some of their customers. You simply can't take away a feature in that fashion.
The expansion hasn't even been officialy announced yet, and its still in development. Whats been leaked is whats been shown to a magazine, not EVERYTHING that will be included. Its like when they came up with the idea to make the expansion, you know what was going to be in the expansion at that time? Nothing. I'm sure more will be added as time goes on, and more that they are keeping in their bag for now.

You are right on BGs, but if you look at the way Blizzard usualy does things you'll have insight in the way this will probably go down. It's more properly stated "By the time the expansion is released, the battlegrounds will be shared between servers in order to eliminate queues." Blizzard always makes changes to their core came to coincide with the expansion. They never just abandon the core came.

BTW guys, Wikipedia has a page on the World of Warcraft Expansion with really well done and good information. I recommend looking at that before discussing more.
ByAccident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2005, 05:37 PM   #76
KmoTehGod
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 25
How can any of you think what blizzard has said will be all that in the x pack, just look at all their past ones, war3x was a whole game, it couldve been stand alone, i bet this xpack will have just as much stuff as the original if not more.
KmoTehGod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2005, 09:39 PM   #77
Bractude
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Behind the computer screen
Posts: 3
Ah.. the fun that could happen

Stopped reading at the half of page three..

Anyway; I think it's all fake. Though something I really look forward to to seeing:

"LF 5 man G to Onyxia!"

or

"Screw SM! I'm gonna farm ony!"
Bractude is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 24-10-2005, 09:53 PM   #78
Aureus
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Aureus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4
If it's fake this will be one heck of a hoax. Still, we'll know this weekend, and the issue will be resolved.
Aureus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2005, 09:38 AM   #79
ByAccident
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 2
The "expansion note" looks like complete crap, but the article translation looks real. Their are screenshots, and a scan of the article with pictures in it.
ByAccident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2005, 01:23 PM   #80
freeDragon
WorldofWar.Net Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by OverKill
Blood Elves - Horde

Putting Blood Elves with the Horde makes it practically impossible for them to make a 3rd faction. The Naga, Blood Elf, Draenei faction is outforever.
<snip>
The Forsaken have their own agenda... they may start their own faction with whomever they seem fit.
Forsaken and Blood Elves... a Dark Faction >;-[
freeDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement System V2.5 By   Branden